Kratom in the U.S.: Balancing Potential with Regulation

September 8, 2023

Kratom and Its Significance

Kratom, scientifically identified as Mitragyna speciosa, boasts a rich history that stretches across the dense rainforests of Southeast Asia. Indigenous communities in countries like Thailand, Indonesia, and Malaysia have, for centuries, recognized and utilized the plant’s therapeutic properties. While kratom’s potential spans a broad spectrum, it is particularly revered for its analgesic effects, offering pain relief, and its ability to uplift moods, potentially aiding those grappling with anxiety or depression.

 

The science behind these properties is intriguing. Two primary alkaloids, mitragynine and 7-hydroxymitragynine, are credited for most of kratom’s effects. These compounds interact with opioid receptors in the human brain, but it’s essential to clarify that this doesn’t mean kratom is an opioid. Instead, it suggests that the plant can produce opioid-like effects, which explains its efficacy in pain management and mood modulation.

 

The natural habitat of kratom offers further insights into its characteristics. Thriving in humid, tropical rainforests, kratom has evolved to withstand and flourish under consistent rainfall, high humidity, and warm temperatures. This specific environment ensures the plant develops a rich profile of compounds, which might vary when the plant is grown in different climates or conditions. As a result, the place of cultivation becomes crucial in determining the plant’s potency and efficacy, a detail often overlooked but fundamental to understanding its therapeutic potential.

FDA’s Controversial Stance on Kratom and Broader Implications

In recent times, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has taken a rather contentious stance on kratom, sparking extensive debates within medical, legislative, and user communities. At the heart of the controversy was the FDA’s proposition to classify kratom as a Schedule 1 substance under the Controlled Substances Act. Such a classification is not taken lightly, as Schedule 1 substances are deemed to have a high potential for abuse and lack recognized medical applications. To put this into perspective, other drugs that fall under this category include potent substances like heroin and LSD.

 

This proposed classification raised eyebrows and generated concern for several reasons. Firstly, it contradicted the traditional use of kratom in Southeast Asia, where indigenous communities have revered the plant for its therapeutic benefits for centuries. Secondly, the FDA’s recommendation seemed to disregard a body of scientific studies that had pointed to the potential medicinal value of kratom. Jim Carroll, who served as the director of the Office of National Drug Control Policy from 2018 to 2021, aptly remarked on this issue, stating, “FDA did not paint the entire picture. Maybe they didn’t have the entire picture, but everyone else did.

 

This skepticism was amplified by the unified resistance to the FDA’s recommendations. Not one, but three key agencies – each with its expertise and understanding of substances and their implications – pushed back against the FDA’s stance. The Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) did not accept the recommendation. Similarly, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and the Expert Committee on Drug Dependence (ECDD) for the U.N. Commission on Narcotic Drugs, a globally recognized entity, diverged from the FDA’s viewpoint.

 

The collective dismissal from these three agencies underscores the complexities surrounding kratom and suggests that a nuanced approach, grounded in thorough research and understanding, is required when determining its legal and medical status. This widespread disagreement also underscores the need for collaboration and open dialogue, ensuring that decisions made are balanced, informed, and prioritize public health and safety.

FDA’s Alternative Measures and the Surge in Domestic Kratom Cultivation

Faced with the refusal to approve their proposition to classify kratom as a Schedule 1 drug, the FDA sought alternative pathways to curb the proliferation of this Southeast Asian plant in the U.S. Instead of an outright prohibition on kratom imports, the FDA implemented two stringent import alerts. While not an explicit ban, these alerts placed such demanding criteria on kratom that meeting the requirements for scheduling under the Controlled Substances Act (CSA) became nearly impossible. Many industry insiders and advocates view this maneuver as an overreach of the FDA’s authority, especially since these alerts rest primarily on the FDA’s debated claims regarding kratom’s safety and addiction potential.

 

With these barriers to importing kratom, the U.S. market dynamics faced a significant disturbance. The once straightforward avenue of accessing kratom from foreign sources became obfuscated, giving rise to a pressing demand for domestically cultivated kratom. In response to this growing need, Hawaii Kratom emerged prominently. As the sole commercial kratom farm in Hawaii and one of the few within the United States, its significance cannot be understated. Hawaii’s climate mirrors the natural environment of kratom, providing it with the optimal conditions for growth. The only other State with potential is Florida, where occasional temperature dips into the 50’s can hamper kratom’s growth and diminish its alkaloid potency.

The Science Behind Kratom

Numerous scientific inquiries, highlighted by those conducted by the esteemed National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA), challenge the narrative presented by the FDA regarding kratom’s potential for addiction. NIDA’s comprehensive studies provide a more nuanced understanding of the plant’s effects. They ascertain that kratom, when consumed in its unadulterated form, lacks the hallmarks of substances with high addiction liability. Scott Hemby, who researches kratom and chairs the Department of Basic Pharmaceutical Sciences at High Point University in North Carolina, agrees. In a 2019 article, Hemby told CNN the plant “has very low abuse potential…”

Furthermore, the contention that kratom has been the cause of numerous deaths is put into perspective when delving deeper into the specifics of these cases. Detailed examinations of such incidents reveal a multifaceted picture. Many times, the kratom involved was adulterated, indicating the presence of other substances that could have contributed to the adverse effects. In other cases, polydrug use – the concurrent use of multiple drugs – played a critical role. This makes it challenging to pinpoint kratom as the sole culprit. Additionally, pre-existing health conditions, which can make individuals more susceptible to complications from any substance, were identified in some of those who died, further muddying the waters on kratom’s direct responsibility.

The Need for Kratom Regulation

The discourse around kratom has shifted from solely its potential harm to the importance of its safe and regulated use. Proper oversight ensures that consumers receive pure, unadulterated kratom, maximizing its therapeutic benefits. Without stringent regulations, there’s room for dishonest vendors to sell adulterated or sub-standard kratom, posing health threats.

 

Effective quality standards and monitoring ensure consumers’ confidence in kratom’s authenticity and purity. The absence of oversight invites risks, as vendors might sell tainted kratom or inferior products, undermining its benefits and introducing health hazards.

 

Thus, regulatory intervention is essential, both for public health and to bolster kratom’s reputation as a responsibly used beneficial substance.

Hawaii: A Potential Blueprint for Domestic Kratom Farming

Hawaii presents a unique opportunity in the U.S. for kratom cultivation due to its ideal tropical climate. As the only state with conditions naturally suited for this rainforest plant, Hawaii is poised to transform kratom into a significant cash crop. Currently, the domestic U.S. kratom market is booming, registering impressive annual revenues of approximately $1.13 billion according to the American Kratom Association.

Beyond just meeting the demand for kratom, there’s potential for this botanical to make considerable inroads into the vast $20 billion U.S. opioid market. With its reputed analgesic properties, kratom might offer a more natural alternative to traditional opioids. As such, Hawaii’s role in providing high-quality, domestically grown kratom could be instrumental in reshaping the American landscape of pain management and opioid alternatives.

Conclusion

The journey of kratom in the U.S. reveals a complex interplay of tradition, science, regulation, and market dynamics. Its rich history in Southeast Asia contrasts sharply with the hesitance and debates it has sparked in American corridors of power. But as the narrative around kratom continues to evolve, it becomes evident that the plant holds undeniable potential, both therapeutically and economically. Hawaii, with its favorable climate, emerges as a beacon of hope, not just as a cultivation hub, but as a testament to kratom’s future in America. As we move forward, it’s imperative that dialogue remains open, research is encouraged, and regulation is thoughtful. Only through such a balanced approach can the U.S. truly harness the benefits of kratom while ensuring the safety and well-being of its citizens.

Leave a Reply:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *